Child Benefit Sadface: the perils of BIK

Nobody loves a good sob story than the British and this is one I saw this week (although it might be doing the rounds) Daily Record Grimsby debt story

I have no sympathy (as you might expect) but my reasons need some explaining.Howcana

Child Benefit

For a bit of background information; child benefit is paid to all parents/guardians of children in the UK. You do need to register for it but it’s easy to do and payments are maid 4-weekly until the kid stops being a kid at 16 or 20 if in education or training (or your circumstances change like divorce/separation).

By claiming Child Benefit:

  • you can get National Insurance credits which count towards your State Pension (very important for Early Retirement plans)
  • your child will automatically get a National Insurance number when they’re 16 years old (so you can look cool with a NI card in your wallet beside your fake ID)

If you choose not to get Child Benefit payments, you should still fill in and send off the claim form just for the NI credits.

It’s not much but tax free – only £20.70 a week for the first kid and £13.70 for each kid thereafter. For our two we get £34.40 per week (£137.60 4-weekly or £1788.80 per annum).

Compared to other countries in Europe it’s shit – you get more in Poland FFS! But the UK is funny like that, you get millions of families living off in work benefits like Child Tax Credit that can easily add up to £10,000+ a year in free money.

So far, so easy – let’s make it more complex

From 2013 the government introduced the High Income Child Benefit Tax Charge meaning if a single earner in a household claiming child allowance earned more than £50,000 then the allowance is cut by 1% for every £100 extra earned and at £60,000 it disappears. You still crucially get NI Stamps though.

Now, this is a little blunt and two earners at £49,000 aren’t affected but one earner at £60,000 losing everything. People weren’t happy and in the case of our sad face story it can trap people by accident especially since what the government classes as taxable-income includes Benefits In Kind (BIK).

The story is that before the Mr Grimsby wasn’t earning above £50,000 but got a pay rise in a new job. This included a company car (which is a BIK and was reported on his P11D) which took his total taxable income above £50,000 meaning he lost some of his child benefit entitlement whilst still claiming. The HMRC come after him for a total of £7,400 that he was not entitled to and he comes crying. They say that they can’t afford to pay this debt and it’s probably causing a lot of hurt, anger and stress – poor family.

What went wrong

Ignore how you feel about this case or the HMRC. How can it be that getting a substantial payrise (and a free car) can make you poorer? The answer is lifestyle inflation. You can bet that they spent all that money before they earned it and paid their taxes.

How to avoid it the GFF way

There are simple ways to reduce your taxable income like paying into your pension and making charitable donations. We’ve been potentially affected and I’ve used the benefit of having money to ensure that we weren’t. Anyone paying 40% tax would be mad to not pay into their pension – he should have done that. He was taking home more money than before so he should have been able to engineer his finances to cap earnings at £50,000 – having his cake and eat it too.

Also, there’s flexibility on company cars. I had a car allowance once and opted for the cash option (Tax + NI) but the car I eventually bought cost £8k. How much do you think this guy’s car was?

This is a classic case of lifestyle inflation.

Don’t hate the game if you don’t know the rules

Ignorance is no defense when it comes to the law or taxes. The changes were well publicised at the time and moaning about it won’t change things (see the WASPI problem).

It was this man’s responsibility to manage his own and family affairs, to understand the tax rules and to learn how to best navigate them. I have no sympathy for his own idiocy although it does fill my heart with schadenfreude!

Have a great weekend,




  1. I agree with you that he should just deal with this instead of complaining in the press. He may have arrears of car benefit tax to pay too.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I saw the article too and had little sympathy. I agree that the loss of child benefit for a single earner at over 50k vs a dual earning household each earning 49k is rather unfair. I was going to be affected but paid more into my pension via salary sacrifice. I do rather wonder what the family thought they’d gain by crying to the press though.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. there’s a great site called angry people in local papers which is just full of this type of thing.
      Thinking again about this story, it shows the value in not spending all you earn – because after all is said and done, the family have more money than before and are unhappier as a result.
      Simple salary sacrifice (possibly by getting a cheaper car) would have been a real smart thing to do.
      We’ve been at risk of this but I can’t complain about it – it’s a new rule that you need to know when you want to play the game (and win).


      1. My local “news”paper has lots of these stories accompanied with the mandatory sad face. It goes to show that many households aren’t financially literate which is a real shame. Financial literacy is not an interesting subject to many but it can make a significant difference. I’ve got a decent standard of living and I’ve just but my extra earnings into pensions, investments and paying off the mortgages. As you mention, a lot of households just see a pay increase or bonus as an opportunity to spend it. For many households retirement feels a long way off in the future and the stock market is a casino. If I hadn’t have made “aggressive” salary sacrifice arrangements I’d have been liable for something like 50k in tax over the past couple of years. I’d rather have that money in my pension.


      2. same situation for us – when I had it, I salary sacrficed a huge amount into my pension.
        Unfortunately, a car that you can’t afford is more important for a family man like Wayne from Hull than planning for your future.


  3. I recently got hit with this. Turns out that even though my salary was below 50k, the bonus and overtime took me over in 2018. I got a nice letter from HMRC asking me to check again.

    Sure I wasn’t pleased to pay up but managed it. I also made sure I increased my pension contributions to get me under for the next year and is something I will be keeping a much closer eye on in future.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Sorry to hear that.
      It’s a shame that we have to watch out for all these rules and loopholes in the tax system.
      It’s not fair on middle earners to a) get no uc b) lose child benefit
      And pay for nursery fees!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s